Articles

From 4Q 2001 ORBIT, reprinted with permission of Bently Nevada.
Printable PDF* Version (562KB)

Clean Up Your Oil - Revisited

C. David Whitefield, P.E.
Principal Applications
Engineer
Bently Nevada Corporation

Editor’s note: This article is an update to an article previously published in the Fourth Quarter 1999 ORBIT. The ISO section has been updated to conform to the latest ISO specification for fluid cleanliness, ISO 4406:1999. Please see the sidebar for additional details on the changes arising from ISO 4406:1999.

Contaminated oil kills machines. Clean oil is one of the most important factors affecting the service life of the lubricated components of all machinery. (For the purposes of this article, and in keeping with common industry practice, the terms "clean" and "cleanliness" refer to the amount and size of particulate contamination in a lubricating or hydraulic fluid.) In hydraulic systems, clean fluid is absolutely essential for successful long-term operation. Although machines equipped with rolling element bearings are especially sensitive to particulate contamination, machines using fluid-film bearings are not immune to such damage. Many sources cite dramatic improvements in expected machine life resulting from even modest improvements in lubricant cleanliness.

This all sounds reasonable, and smacks of common sense. However, closer scrutiny reveals a few important questions:

  • How is oil cleanliness quantified?
  • How clean is “new” oil?
  • How clean does your oil need to be?
  • What improvements in machine life can you expect from cleaning up your oil?
  • What about other types of contamination?
  • What steps can you take to clean up your oil?

Let’s look at these issues one at a time …

How Is Oil Cleanliness Quantified?

ISO 4406:1999 establishes the relationship between particle counts and cleanliness in hydraulic fluids (common practice has extended the application of this standard to lubricants as well). This international standard uses a code system to quantify contaminant levels by particle size in micrometers (µm). Using ISO 4406:1999, a machine owner/operator can set simple limits for excessive contamination levels, based on quantifiable cleanliness measurements.

Table 1 illustrates the ISO 4406:1999 cleanliness codes.(The ISO standard calls the codes "scale numbers." You may also find them referred to as "range numbers" and represented as R 4 /R 6 /R 14 .) This standard allows you to quantify current particulate cleanliness levels and set targets for cleanup. The standard provides a 3-part code to represent the number of particles per milliliter (mL) of fluid greater than or equal to 4 µm, 6 µm, and 14 µm, respectively. For example, referring to Table 1, an ISO code of 17/15/13 would indicate 640 to 1300 particles/mL greater than or equal to 4 µm, 160 to 320 particles/mL greater than or equal to 6 µm, and 40 to 80 particles/mL greater than or equal to 14 µm are present in the lubricant. Notice each step in the ISO code represents either double or half the particle count relative to an adjacent code. It is important to note that the “/” character in the written form of the code is merely a separator, and does not signify a ratio of the scale numbers.

ISO 4406:199 Fluid Cleanliness Codes

ISO Code Example

Number of Particles Per 1 mL of Fluid
ISO Code Minimum Maximum
1 0.01 0.02
2 0.02 0.04
3 0.04 0.08
4 0.08 0.16
5 0.16 0.32
6 0.32 0.64
7 0.64 1.3
8 1.3 2.5
9 2.5 5.0
10 5.0 10.0
11 10.0 20.0
12 20.0 40.0
13 40.0 80.0
14 80.0 160.0
15 160 320
16 320 640
17 640 1300
18 1300 2500
19 2500 5000
20 5000 10000
21 10000 20000
22 20000 40000
23 40000 80000
24 80000 160000
25 160000 320000
26 320000 640000
27 640000 1300000
28 1300000 2500000
Table 1

How Clean Is “New” Oil?

Studies of “new” turbine oils, crankcase oils, hydraulic fluids and bearing oils delivered to customers indicate varying degrees of cleanliness. Drum-delivered products were generally found to be cleaner than bulk-delivered products. Improper storage procedures can contribute additional contamination to new oil. Poor handling practices are another source of new oil contamination. (Do you know what types of containers are used in your plant for transporting and adding makeup oil? Are they as clean as you want your oil to be?) After implementing cleanup programs, many users discover that the dirtiest oil in their plant is the incoming “new” oil. Therefore, it is clear that proper filtering of new oil during or before filling is a prudent and highly desirable practice in order to extend machine life.

How Clean Does Your Oil Need to Be?

Typical Base-cleanliness Targets
Roller bearing 16/14/12
Journal bearing 17/15/12
Industrial gearbox 17/15/12
Mobile gearbox 17/16/13
Diesel engine 17/16/13
Steam turbine 18/15/12
Paper machine 19/16/13
Table 2

Each machine class should be evaluated for cleanliness levels appropriate to the application. In general, machines with tight clearances and/or anti-friction (rolling element) bearings benefit greatly from very clean oil. Turbine electro-hydraulic control (EHC) systems and many aeroderivative gas turbines are examples of industrial machines that require extremely clean oil for proper performance and long life. Filter systems rated to remove particles as small as 3 µm to 7 µm are commonly used in such applications. Hydraulic systems targets should also be adjusted to cleaner levels due to higher system operating pressures.

Table 2 presents some typical lubricating oil base-cleanliness targets for common machines and machine elements. Like most guidelines, these targets are suggested as starting points. You will probably make adjustments to these levels as you learn how your machines respond to cleaner lubricants.

What Improvements in Machine Life Can You Expect From Cleaning Up Your Oil?

While it may feel good to know you have clean oil in your machines, how good can you afford to feel? The answer to this question depends to some degree on the specific machine application. However, studies performed across many industries all show dramatic extensions in expected machinery life by improving lubricant cleanliness. In one example, the reduction of particles larger than 10 µm from 1000/mL to 100/mL resulted in a 5-fold increase in machine life … an attractive return on your cleanup investment. An additional benefit of cleaner oil is a lower noise-floor for wear-particle detection measurements. It’s much easier to detect subtle changes in the amount of wear debris in a clean system than it is in a dirty one.

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) studies have shown engine wear reductions of 50% when filtering crankcase oil to 30 µm, and 70% when filtering to 15 µm, as compared with filtering to 40 µm. By implementing some of the measures outlined in this article, you will soon be able to document your own success stories.

What About Other Types of Contamination?

As destructive as particulate contamination can be, there are other contaminants that also contribute to oil degradation and premature machine wear. A short list of “non-particulate” contaminants includes water, coolants, fuels, and process fluids. The most common of these is water, which by itself is a significant factor in lubricant degradation (Figure 6). When combined with iron or copper particles, water becomes even more powerful in attacking lubricant base stocks and additives. The adverse effects of water in oil include:

  • Lubricant breakdown, through oxidation and additive precipitation.
  • Changes in viscosity, affecting the ability of a lubricant to maintain the film thickness necessary to protect the lubricated surfaces.
  • Corrosion.
  • Accelerated fatigue of lubricated surfaces.

Even very small amounts of water can be harmful in machines equipped with rolling element bearings. Typical life reduction of rolling element bearings caused by various concentrations of water in oil is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Effect of water on Rolling Element Bearing life

Lubricant film thickness in fluid-film journal bearings is substantially larger than found in rolling element bearings, and hydrodynamic pressures are typically lower. However, the babbitt material in these bearings, being composed primarily of lead and tin, is susceptible to oxidation damage from water and oxygen. Water can also reduce the load-carrying capacity of a fluid-film bearing lubricant sufficiently to cause journal-to-bearing contact (wiping). The reduction in film thickness also exacerbates the sensitivity of fluid-film bearings to particulate contaminants.

What Steps Can You Take to Clean Up Your Oil?

Let’s say you are now convinced that cleanup is the way to go, but do you know how to get there? Filtration, storage, and handling procedures are the key areas in which to concentrate your energies. The important elements of a successful campaign to clean up your oils are:

  • Measure and evaluate current cleanliness levels to establish baselines for comparison.
  • Examine and evaluate your current storage and handling practices.
  • Set cleanliness targets based on your goals for longer machine life and/or reduced maintenance and downtime costs.
  • Evaluate, select, and implement the improvements in filtration, storage, and handling procedures required to achieve your goals.
  • Measure and trend your progress. (Don't be afraid to adjust your procedures as needed to meet your targets.)
  • Document the impact of your investment on availability, maintenance expense, and machine life.

With these elements delineated, some of the practical aspects of improving your filtration, storage, and handling procedures can be addressed.

Improving Your Filtration, Storage, and Handling Procedures

Many improvements to your filtration, storage, and handling procedures can be made with minimal cost. A little time spent simply reviewing your current procedures can be revealing (and in some cases, even shocking). Figures 2 through 4 illustrate a few common problems likely to be encountered in many operations. During the evaluation phase it is important to identify contamination sources as well as their levels. Contamination sources may include:

  • Contaminated new oil. As previously mentioned, new oil is often not as clean as you might think; sometimes it becomes contaminated during transportation, storage, or handling.
  • Built-in contamination. Machine components can become contaminated from handling practices encountered during overhauls or rebuilding processes. It is important to review shop procedures relating to cleanliness of internal wetted parts, hoses, and lubricant piping.
  • Ingested contamination. Unfiltered sump vents and faulty seals are common problems that can result in contaminants (including water or particulates) entering the lube system from the outside environment. Minor modifications to vent systems can reap rewards in this area.
  • Internally generated contamination. Recirculating wear particles through machine components can create a self-fulfilling prophecy of machine destruction. Normal full-flow filtering removes some, but not all, wear particles; and in fact, many full-flow filtration systems are only effective at removing particles larger than 40 µm. Concentrating on the hardest and most abrasive particles is an effective strategy for this category of contaminants.

Once the contamination sources are identified, you can concentrate on the areas most likely to generate your target cleanliness levels.

How does dirt get in?

Poor filtering practices -
filler neck screen punched out.

Figure 2

Poor Storage Practices -
loose bung (drum cap).

Figure 3

Poor handling practices -
dirty fill pump.

Figure 4

Filtration

Off-line recirculating (“kidney loop”) filtration systems can be very effective in achieving and maintaining your cleanliness targets. In some cases, a permanent installation is called for, with continuous sidestream (“bypass”) filtering. For less critical applications, where sump volumes are usually smaller, the job can often be handled with a cart-mounted portable filtration system (Figure 5). These portable systems can be used at scheduled intervals, or in response to increasing contamination trends in your oil analysis data. Portable systems can also be used for pre-filtering new oil before or during system charging. Cartridge-type filters are common on this type of equipment, so you can easily change to the appropriate filter element for the specific cleanliness target of each machine or machine class being serviced. Since cross-contamination is a possibility with portable systems, filter changes and adequate flushing are essential before use with a different lubricant. Maintaining separate systems for each lubricant being filtered is a way to avoid this potential problem.

Figure 5: Portable filter cart.

Storage and Handling

Improvements to storage and handling procedures can often be implemented at low cost, relative to the benefits. Controlling temperature over a relatively narrow range is important for proper drum storage. Drums “breathe” as the internal pressure increases and decreases with temperature variations, causing moisture and other contaminants to get pulled into the drum when the internal pressure decreases. In most climates, this problem must be addressed by storing drums in enclosed, temperature-controlled storage facilities. Shielding storage containers from dirt and moisture are other obvious measures that will keep your new oil in good condition. Be as careful with pumps and transfer containers as you are with your storage containers. This will minimize the chances of cross-contamination with other lubricants or the introduction of contaminants into machines when topping or filling.

Water Removal

Because the sources of water contamination are so numerous and ubiquitous, eliminating all sources of moisture ingestion can be very difficult. Removing water from oil can also be a challenging task, but there are several methods available. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, so each must be carefully evaluated for the particular application. Some of the common methods for removing water from oil, along with their tradeoffs, include:

  • Settling/Evaporation
    • Natural – gravity acts on the water to separate it from the oil and water escapes from the fluid via natural evaporation.
    • Inexpensive.
    • Least effective of known methods.
    • Requires properly designed reservoir.
    • Removes only free water.
  • Centrifuging (Centrifugal Separation)
    • Removes only free water to about 20 ppm by weight above saturation point.
    • Does not remove entrained gases.
    • Tends to increase emulsified water content.
    • Removes dirt and other solids.
    • Since this is a physical separation method, there is some potential for additive removal.
  • Coalescing Filters/Screens
    • Removes only free water.
    • Uses a coalescing cartridge filter to separate the water from the oil.
    • Since this is a physical separation method, there is some potential for additive removal.
    • Only effective for a narrow viscosity range and a narrow specific gravity range.
    • Some manufacturers claim “No removal of additives.”
  • Filter/Dryers
    • Cartridge-type filters that use super absorbent materials to soak up water as the wet lubricant passes through.
    • Does not remove dissolved water.
  • Vacuum Treating (Vacuum Dehydrating)
    • Uses simultaneous exposure of the wet lubricant to heat and vacuum to separate the water.
    • Because it is a chemical separation, it tends not to remove additives from the lubricant.
    • Capable of removing dissolved, emulsified, and free water.
    • When combined with effective filtration media, capable of being a highly effective lubricant purification system.
  • Gas Sparging/Air Stripping
    • Operates on the chemical separation principle of air stripping.
    • Removes dissolved, emulsified, and free water.
    • Does not remove additives.
    • Can use nitrogen or air.

Figure 6: Visual effects of water in oil.

Purchasing Clean Oil

An additional cleanup step, often overlooked, is to specify the cleanliness levels of the lubricants you purchase. You may pay a little more initially, but the savings in machine availability, filtration costs, and machine life extension often more than offset the additional cost. If you choose this route, be sure to test the incoming oil to verify you are getting what you pay for.

Conclusion —

It’s best not to take administration of your oils lightly. Attention to detail is paramount in achieving cleanliness levels that yield significant improvements in machine life and availability. When it comes to machine life, lubricant cleanup has proven to be one of the simpler and more cost-effective methods of achieving measurable improvement. Don't wait for contaminants to destroy your machines. Clean up your oil and keep it clean!

References

  1. Toms, Larry A., Machinery Oil Analysis, Second Edition, Coastal Skills Training, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
  2. Fitch, J.C., Oil Analysis Course Manual, Noria Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  3. A Guide to Standards for Contamination Specifications in Liquids, Pacific Scientific Instruments, HIAC Royco Division.
  4. ISO 4406:1999, International Standards Organization.
  5. Industrial Oils, Chevron USA, Incorporated.
  6. The Handbook of Hydraulic Filtration, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Parker Filtration Division.
  7. Machine Design, “How Dirt and Water Affect Bearing Life,” Timken Bearing Company.

*Files in PDF format requires Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or later to view. It is a free download at the Adobe Site.

Copyright © 2008 BTS. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Statement